Scientists use mathematical calculations to PROVE the existence of God

[Insider]

Maths does make sense, and sometimes points to a greater power, look at the beauty of the Fibonacci Sequence,





Scientists use mathematical calculations to PROVE the existence of God
SCIENTISTS have ‘confirmed’ the existence of God after proving a mathematician’s theory which suggests that there is a higher power.

Two computer scientists say they proved that there is a holy supreme force after confirming the equations.

In 1978, mathematician Kurt Gödel died and left behind a long and complex theory based on modal logic.

Dr Gödel’s model uses mathematical equations that are extremely complicated, but the essence is that no greater power than God can be conceived, and if he or she is believed as a concept then he or she can exist in reality.

Scientists use mathematical calculations to PROVE the existence of God

Mathematical proof of the existence of God.

Physicist: This derivation isn’t particularly easy, but bear with me. It’s essentially a re-phrasing of a joint work by Descartes, Godel, and Hawking.


Beginning with the unitarity of quantum probability you find the non-vanishing deism coefficient manifest.

Mathematical proof of the existence of God.

 

[Insider]

One of the most interesting ideas comes from the Fibonacci Sequence
: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, ... The nextis found by adding up the two before it.

[font=arial, sans-serif]This gives us this type of image[/font]

Whilst itself isnt proof of the existence of God it does show that there is some intelligence in how the universe is created, when you consider how this sequence is spread throughout life itself.







So what else do we have to help us have belief in a God?

We naturally have the testament of Jesus Christ, we have the book of the old testament and from the bible most of western culture has set its morals and values to create the world we have today.

Most people know right from wrong, we have the capabilities of love and understanding, care and compassion, none of these things are essential for life to flourish, life can exist without love and care but for human`s it is part of our overall process of existing. On the flip side we have the negative side of humanity, Greed, selfishness and anger. These are taught to us from the bible as evil traits and ones we should steep clear off despite the temptations to persuade. In life these traits are not needed, we live in an age where we could co-exist with nature and each other but because these traits exist some people crave them and work towards them.

We also have NDE, ( Near Death Experiences), I have met two people in my life who have shared these experiences. Both are sincere and have been able to describe things that they would have no knowledge off, such as describing the layout of the A&E room they died in. What they have explained to me is the beauty that awaits, or in the other persons experience the loneliness and despair of what awaits.

Science should not have to challenge God, Science should be supporting the very existence of God.

 

[Insider]

Not surprisingly, spiral galaxies also follow the familiar Fibonacci pattern. The Milky Way has several spiral arms, each of them a logarithmic spiral of about 12 degrees. As an interesting aside, spiral galaxies appear to defy Newtonian physics. As early as 1925, astronomers realized that, since the angular speed of rotation of the galactic disk varies with distance from the center, the radial arms should become curved as galaxies rotate. Subsequently, after a few rotations, spiral arms should start to wind around a galaxy. But they don't — hence the so-called

The stars on the outside, it would seem, move at a velocity higher than expected — a unique trait of the cosmos that helps preserve its shape.

Loading…

io9.gizmodo.com

 

[Insider]

I came across this interesting fact the other day.

When we take the average synodic period of the planets in our solar system ( Their average month length ) and raise it to the powers

.6
.66
.666
.6666
.66666
.666666

You approach the average distance for each planet from the Sun in AU ( Astronomical units )

So, to clarify, for example:

The average sidereal period for Venus ( In earth years ) is

.615187 years

the average distance from the Sun in AU is

.722332 AU

So then

.615187^.666666 = .72333294

This is 99.999% accurate

This method is 100 accurate for Earth and the least accurate is Pluto at 99.8%

Let's think about the units here:

An AU is based on feet / inches

The astronomical unit (symbol AU) is a unit of length, roughly the distance from Earth to the Sun. However, that distance varies as Earth orbits the Sun, from a maximum (aphelion) to a minimum (perihelion) and back again once a year.

It is now defined as exactly 149,597,870,700 metres (about 150 million kilometres, or 93 million miles

5280 feet per mile = 63360 inches

Now

Feet / inches are an ancient measure

Let me show you something here about the " Biblical cubit "

1 foot = 12 inches / 1 cubit = 18 inches

this is

12 / 18 = .666666...


In summary this tells us one thing,

it means it is not possible the planets positioned themselves in orbit, someone or something had to do it so they had this perfect mathematical position.

 

[Insider]

Sidereal Time in Earth Years
-----------------------------------------------
Mercury 0.240846 (87.9691 days)
Venus 0.615 (225 days)
Earth 1 (365.25636 solar days)
Mars 1.881
Jupiter 11.86
Saturn 29.46
Uranus 84.01
Neptune 164.8
Pluto 248.1

Then you take the sidereal "year" of any planet and square it (times it by itself):

Mercury example 0.240846 x 0.240846 = 0.058006795716

Then take the cube root (what number times itself three times equals the number we have):

Mercury again the cube root of 0.058006795716 is 3871027815
_
This (above) is what it means to raise a number to the power of .66666 --> square it, then take the cube root.

This is a simple multiple of the year, yielding the following table:

Sidereal Time in Earth Years raised to the power of .66
-----------------------------------------------
Mercury 0.3871027815
Venus 0.72318611
Earth 1
Mars 1.5237926
Jupiter 5.2006360
Saturn 9.5386847
Uranus 19.1817101
Neptune 30.058788
Pluto 39.4837

He then says that the number in the table above should be almost 100% accurate for the average distance that planet is from the Sun if we are using "Earth distance from the Sun" as our measuring stick (called AU).


Average distance from Sun in AU
-----------------------------------------------
Mercury 0.39
Venus 0.72
Earth 1.00
Mars 1.52
Jupiter 5.20
Saturn 9.58
Uranus 19.23
Neptune 30.10
Pluto 39.3 average distance from the Sun (It varies by 9.6 AU due to orbital eccentricity.)

So....

This implies that there is a multiplier for each planet's distance from the Sun... Which planet has the multiplier of 1? That would be the architecturally fundamental planet right?

Quite curious.

 

[Insider]